Why Open Source software but not M$
M$ tax is unfair
E.g. My friend is going to buy an IBM notebook, although he own
legal licence to use M$ windos in this machine and he is going to use
linux on it, IBM wont sell him a notebook unless he pay the fee of M$.
bugs and other issue involved in the structure of closed source
A lots of M$ patches have wel-known bugs which involves other
serious bugs, we have no choices but chocing staying with the old bugs
or new patches and new bugs.
In a word, If I do not need to buy a Sony CD player just to listen Maria
Carey. or Phillips DVD player to play a PolyGram DVD title, why should I
be forced to use IE just to browse webpage or to use Word just to read the
document people sent to me?
When Amercan are trying to defense freedom and say no the greedy CEOs who
stealing money from people using injustise means, why cant we say "no" to
M$?
Further contact: Send email to kcting@cs.uh.edu