Demo was graded on following points:
I. Presentation (10)
II. Q & A (10)
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5)
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5)
V. Extensiblity check (10)
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10)
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8)

MedicAid:
I. Presentation (10) : 10
	Fairly good presentation.
II. Q & A (10) : 10
	Good quick response to questions.
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 4
	UI Validation in control tier was good. Adding new types like 
	X-Ray was done well. Good attention to SRP, input validation,
	exception handling. Good use of patterns like Mediator.
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 4
	Better GUI would be nice. interface for DB
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 10
	Extensiblity of storage mechanism may be improved. Other parts were
	done well however, like ones mentioned above.
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 10
	Adequate
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (48) 7.68
	Job well done.

Student Testing System:
I. Presentation (10) : 10
	Good introduction and presentation. Probably the best organized presentation 
	that covered overall aspects of the system. Good job.
II. Q & A (10) : 10
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 4
	Some responses were firing out of range and had to drag back to issues.
	Team work, requirements focused design, principles applied.
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 5
	User friendly UI, serializing without violating LSP, extensibility on question
	types.
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 7
	Adding new types of questions requires substratial change. May be handled better.
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 10
	Good job on this one.
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (46) 7.36

SyndiSnag:
I. Presentation (10) : 5
	Stalled at presentation. Had to ask repeatedly to speak up and proceed. 
	Gave an impression as if had nothing to present. Team very reluctant to
	answer questions - most response to questions were a raise of an eyebrow
	or a shrug.
II. Q & A (10) : 5
	Comments above.
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 1
	Shrug was the first response. Upon further probing, mentioned multithreading,
	HTML controls usage.
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 3
	Checking for different RSS support. Mentioned efforts to use Abstract factory,
	but was not implemented in the code though.
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 5
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 1
	Unable to add category and channel that performed the core functionality.
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (20) 3.2
	Very hard to get any answers from the group. Team members more interested in
	dividing than working together. Shows complete lack of coordination and
	leadership. Received complaints from team members two days before demo that
	some team members are refusing to integrate or work together in integration.
	The demo was no surprise from that point of view - it did not function.

Bug-base:
I. Presentation (10): 10
	Well presented. 
II. Q & A (10) : 10
	Answer questions pretty well.
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 5
	Excellent job on how workflow as implemented. Permissions with configuration is a good
	step but shaky from security point of view!
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 5
	Parts of the system design may be improved. Other types of UI, web based may be suitable.
	Packaging may be revisited.
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 8
	Use of enumerations while very appealing is a hurdle to extensiblity. Good job, however,
	on how UI does not change if enumeration is changed.
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 9
	Minor glitches seen
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (47) 7.52
	Good job.

Wheels.com:
I. Presentation (10) : 10
	Good presentation. Nice UI as well.
II. Q & A (10) : 10
	Some answers had to be brought back to track.
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 5
	Card & validation, pair programming, code reuse and validation reuse,
	integration. Use of singleton in DB connection, factory anbd abbstract to
	deal with new types later.
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 2
	Learning curvce in finding and using patterns
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 9
	How to extend to other interfaces like handheld, may result in a few issues
	with extensiblity of adding other kinds of similar products.
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 10
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (46) 7.36
	Good job.

MunchRSS
I. Presentation (10) : 10
	Good presentation and quick response to questions. 
II. Q & A (10) : 10
	Some questions were actually answered before being asked!
III. Good features illustration - things you are proud about (5) : 5
	Very good UI, nice features including drag and drop rules. Nice 
	implementation of class hierarchy.
IV. Bad features illustration - things you would do differently if doing again (5) : 4
	Efforts spent in abstraction of Dialog class illustrated some lessons learnt.
	Some areas may benefit from design revisit and some use of abstract factory 
	may help.
V. Extensiblity check (10) : 9
	RSS feed class may have to be revisited to handle other versions. Some use
	of factory may benefit here.
VI. Stability of product and overall working (10) : 10
	Pretty good. When not supported version of RSS was given, gracefully 
	presented the error and continued. Did not ignore or crash. I like that in
	a product.
Total out of 8 points (points / 50 * 8) : (48) 7.68
	Good work.